Ämnesområden
- +Allmänt. Terminologi. Standardisering. Dokumentation (13)
- +Ledningssystem (3)
- +Kvalitet (0)
- +Naturvetenskap och tillämpad vetenskap (5)
- +Hälso- och sjukvård (23)
- +Miljö- och hälsoskydd. Säkerhet (20)
- +Maskinsäkerhet (2)
- +Metrologi och mätning. Fysikaliska fenomen (5)
- +Provning (2)
- +Mekaniska system och komponenter: allmänt (0)
- +Fluidsystem och delar: allmänt (9)
- +Produktionsteknik (7)
- +Sociologi. Service. Företagsorganisation och företagsledning. Administration. Transport Administration (7)
- +Energi- och värmeöverföring (3)
- +Elektroteknik (0)
- +Elektronik (0)
- +Telekommunikation (0)
- +Informationsteknik, kontorsutrustning (14)
- +Bildteknik (0)
- +Finmekanik. Juvelerararbeten (0)
- +Fordonsteknik (8)
- +Järnvägsteknik (6)
- +Textil- och läderteknik (6)
- +Flyg- och rymdteknik (9)
- +Utrustning för materialhantering (0)
- +Förpackningar och distribution (3)
- +Skeppbyggnadteknik och marina konstruktioner (1)
- +Konfektionsindustri (1)
- +Jordbruk (39)
- +Livsmedelsteknik (4)
- +Kemiteknik (2)
- +Gruvdrift och mineraler (2)
- +Petroleum och motsvarande tekniker (15)
- +Metallurgi (8)
- +Träteknik (2)
- +Glasindustri och keramisk industri (1)
- +Gummi- och plastindustri (21)
- +Pappersteknik (2)
- +Färgindustrin (7)
- +Byggnadsmaterial och byggnader (20)
- +Byggstandardpaket (2)
- +Anläggningsarbete (8)
- +Byggnadsprojektering (1)
- +Militärväsen. Militärteknik. Vapen (0)
- +Hem och hushåll. Underhållning. Sport (7)
- +Externa kategorier (0)
This document defines a framework for assessing the quality of data governance and data management practices for participants in data spaces. It specifies the core principles, processes, and assessment elements that enable organizations to manage, monitor, and improve their data governance and data management practices. The framework comprises two components: • Process Reference Model: Defines key processes for data governance and data product management of data space participants, including its fundamental principles, structure, detailed process definitions, links to broader data governance, and required implementation measures. • Process Assessment Framework: Outlines a model to evaluate process capability by establishing six distinct quality levels expressed in terms of capability levels, describing the corresponding profiles and guiding the systematic assessment. This standard is aimed at supporting data governance and data management professionals, IT managers, quality assurance officers, and regulatory bodies. This standard is applicable to organizations of all types and sizes.
This document provides recommendations for establishing a specification document for a finite element analysis (FEA) for a mechanical product, including type, procedure, modelling principle, solution, analysis and evaluation of the solution results, solution results interpretation, solution results report, and documentary management. It is applicable for FEA based structural analysis for mechanical products. This document can be used in the development of other standards and in support of communications among diverse, interested parties/stakeholders. This document is applicable to all types of organizations (e.g., commercial enterprises, government agencies, not-for-profit organizations). Model-based technology has been used throughout the product life cycle, from its design to the simulation, process, production, maintenance, and disposal, whereby generates a lot of model-based (3D) technical product documents. Simulation is an indispensable part of the product life cycle. The standardization of the technical product documents generated during the operation of simulation is one of the major concerns of ISO/TC 10/SC6. Most of the work of mechanical product design simulation is mechanics analysis, which benefits the R&D of mechanical products with higher quality, lower budget, and shorter time period. Among others, Finite element analysis (FEA) is the most frequently used simulation-based mechanics analysis methods in mechanical product design. FEA for mechanics analysis in product design has been applied in various industry sectors for a long time, therefor gradually evolved into a mature technology. The FEA models and the reports of results are intrinsically technical product documentation, and could be viewed as a kind of functional digital mock-up for mechanical products of great significance in performance evaluation and analysis. The standardization of the models and reports derived from FEA of mechanics analysis should be conducted in ISO/TC 10/SC 6 with high priority. For the simulation-based mechanics analysis for mechanical products using finite element analysis, this proposal specifies the requirements for FEA models and results, including specifications for geometric models, meshing, loading, boundary and initial conditions, solver, visualization, etc. The requirements are categorized as follows: 1) General requirements: including definitions and terminology of finite element analysis, the basic workflow of finite element analysis, models, data, and relevant information involved in finite element analysis; 2) Requirements for modelling of finite element analysis: including geometric modelling and model processing, determination and expression of material properties, selection and verification of the element type, determination of grid cell length and the density of grid, definition and application of the load, selection and application of boundary and initial conditions, model inspection, etc. 3) Requirements for solving and analysis of finite element models: including selection of a solver, analysis type selection, setting parameters of analysis, etc. 4) Post-processing requirements of finite element analysis, including visualization and analysis, contents of the finite element report, inspection, and verification of finite element analysis results, etc.
This document specifies methods for measuring the parameters needed for corrosivity estimation used for classification of the corrosivity of atmospheres in ISO 9223. This document specifies methods for the measurement of environmental parameters for — normative corrosivity estimation based on calculated first-year corrosion rates of standard metals, and — informative corrosivity estimation based on characterization of the exposure environment. This document does not describe the usual analytical techniques for the measured parameters since this depends on the available analytical techniques used in laboratories. Specific methods for deposition measurement of SO2 and Cl− deposition rates and conversion factors for comparison of different measuring methods are presented in Annexes A, B, C, D, E and F. For methods pertaining to the characterization of the atmospheric exposure site in general, see ISO 8565.
This document specifies the general terms and definitions relevant to the utilization of thermoplastics materials in a circular economy in pipes, fittings and ancillaries for both pressure and non-pressure piping systems. This document is intended to be used by specification writers in conjunction with CEN/TS 14541-2 [7] when preparing normative documents under the scope of CEN/TC 155.
This document specifies the technical delivery requirements for open die forgings, forged bars and products pre-forged and finished in ring rolling mills, manufactured from alloy special steel and supplied in the quenched and tempered condition. The majority of steels listed in this document are identical to steels specified in EN ISO 683-1 and EN ISO 683-2 and more extensive information on hardenability and technological properties is given in these standards. General information on technical delivery conditions is given in EN 10021.
This document specifies two methods for the determination of the density of glass fibre tested as a yarn: —Method A: Gas pycnometer method; —Method B: Liquid pycnometer method.
This part of ISO 1268 specifies the general principles and procedures for the compression moulding of test plates from two types of fibre-reinforced thermosetting moulding compound: sheet moulding compound (SMC) and bulk moulding compound (BMC). The aim of this part of ISO 1268 is to ensure the preparation of flat test plates from which test specimens can be cut (for the relevant test methods, see Annex A). The plates are produced in such a way that specimens cut from them give representative results when used in these test methods.
This document outlines the concepts and principles for information management at a stage of maturity described as "building information modelling (BIM) according to the ISO 19650 series". This document provides recommendations for a framework to manage information including exchanging, recording, versioning and organizing for all actors. This document is applicable to the whole life cycle of any built asset, including strategic planning, initial design, engineering, development, documentation and construction, day-to-day operation, maintenance, refurbishment, repair and end-of-life. This document can be adapted to assets or projects of any scale and complexity, so as not to hamper the flexibility and versatility that characterize the large range of potential procurement strategies and so as to address the cost of implementing this document.
This document specifies requirements for information management, in the form of a management process, within the context of the delivery phase of assets and the exchanges of information within it, using building information modelling. This document can be applied to all types of assets and by all types and sizes of organizations, regardless of the chosen procurement strategy.
This document specifies how to perform hardness measurements at other then surrounding or standard laboratory temperatures. This procedure is ment for measurements at lower temperatures as well as those at elevated temperatures.
In the annex a test based on hardness measurements for determining the progressive stiffening of rubber with time, caused by crystallization is given.
This standard applies to lidars installed on road vehicles to measure or detect the surroundings of the vehicle. This standard applies to lidars used on all types of road vehicles regardless of vehicle classifications, including passenger cars, buses, commercial vehicles, trailers, etc. This standard describes a series of test methods to assist in evaluating the performance of lidars. The tests should cover the following: 1. The common performance specifications (e.g. Range capability, Range precision). 2. The common performance characteristics (e.g. Anti-interference, Ghost points). 3. Possible alteration of performance test caused by environmental conditions. 4. Lidar performance for the union of both ADAS/AD application scenarios. This standard does not address test methods for reliability, functional safety, and cybersecurity. Note: The definition of “Road Vehicles” includes M1~M3, N1~N3, and L6~L7 according to consolidated resolution on the construction of vehicles (R.E.3).
ISO 9405:2015 describes the procedures for assessing the overall change in appearance of textile floor coverings caused by Vettermann drum and hexapod tumbler testers according to ISO 10361 and ISO 4918.
WARNING — Persons using this document should be familiar with normal laboratory practices. This document does not purport to address all of the safety problems, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user to establish appropriate safety and health practices and to determine the applicability of any other restrictions. IMPORTANT — It is absolutely essential that tests conducted according to this document be carried out by suitably trained staff. This document specifies methods to determine 99Tc by liquid scintillation counting (LSC) in water supplies, drinking water, rainwater, surface and ground water, marine water, as well as cooling water, industrial water, domestic, and industrial wastewater after proper sampling, handling, and test sample preparation. The detection limit depends on the sample volume, the instrument used, the background count rate, the detection efficiency, the counting time, and the chemical yield. The minimum detectable activity of the methods described in this document, using currently available LSC apparatus, is approximately 5 Bq·l−1 to 20 Bq·l−1, which is lower than the WHO criteria for safe consumption of drinking water (100 Bq·l-1).[4] These values can be achieved with a counting time of 60 min for a sample volume varying between 14 ml to 40 ml. The method presented in this document is not intended for the determination of ultra-trace activity concentrations of 99Tc. The method described in this document is applicable in the event of an emergency situation, but not if 99mTc is present at quantities that could cause interference and not if 99mTc is used as a recovery tracer. Filtration of the test sample is necessary for the methods described in this document if suspended solids are present as the methods presented in this document can only be used to determine soluble 99Tc. The analysis of 99Tc adsorbed to suspended matter is not covered by this method. The analysis of the insoluble fraction requires a mineralization step that is not covered by this document. In this case, the measurement is made on the different phases obtained. The final activity is the sum of all the measured activity concentrations. It is the user’s responsibility to ensure the validity of this test method for the water samples tested.
This document is applicable to the sampling of solid fertilizers and liming materials that have a uniform composition and have no tendency to segregate. NOTE 1 The term product is used throughout the body of this document and is understood to include fertilizers, liming materials and inhibitors unless otherwise indicated. NOTE 2 Manufacturers, importers and sellers can choose to use this method to obtain samples of other products or blends as well as long as both parties to a transaction agree. The build-up of a static heap often leads to granulometric segregation, which makes the collection of a truly representative sample of many products and blends unlikely. NOTE 3 It is the responsibility of manufacturers, importers and sellers, however, to ensure they supply a product that complies with its label declaration at the moment of delivery and fulfils the expectations of the end user at the moment of application. NOTE 4 A method of obtaining a screening sample from a static heap can be found in Annex B.
This document specifies a reference to the method for the determination of the following specific parameters in inorganic fertilizers: — granulometry; — organic carbon content; — dry matter content. This document is applicable to the fertilizing products blends where a blend is a mix of at least two of the following components: fertilizers, liming materials, soil improvers, growing media, inhibitors, plant biostimulants, and where the following category: inorganic fertilizers is the highest % in the blend by mass or volume, or in the case of liquid form by dry mass. If inorganic fertilizer is not the highest % in the blend, the European Standard for the highest % of the blend applies. In case a fertilizing product blend is composed of components in equal quantity, the user decides which standard to apply. Variations in analytical methods for fertilizing product blends can lead to differing results as some components or matrix interactions can affect the outcome. Validation procedures have shown that developed standard methods are robust and reliable across diverse product compositions, but possible interferences and unexpected results when analysing fertilizing product blends are possible.
This document specifies a method for the determination of total organic carbon content by elemental analysis using dry combustion. The method is applicable to inorganic fertilizers containing more than 0,1 % carbon expressed on dry mass. NOTE This method can also be applied to other types of fertilizers, provided the user has verified the applicability. This document is applicable to the fertilizing products blends where a blend is a mix of at least two of the following components: inorganic fertilizers, organic fertilizers, organo-mineral fertilizers, liming materials, soil improvers, growing media, inhibitors, plant biostimulants and where the following category: inorganic fertilizer is the highest % in the blend by mass or volume, or in the case of liquid form by dry mass. If inorganic fertilizer is not the highest % in the blend, the European Standard for the highest % of the blend applies. In case a fertilizing product blend is composed of components in equal quantity, the user decides which standard to apply. Variations in analytical methods for fertilizing product blends can lead to differing results as some components or matrix interactions can affect the outcome. Validation procedures have shown that developed standard methods are robust and reliable across diverse product compositions, but possible interferences and unexpected results when analysing fertilizing product blends are possible.
This document specifies minimum requirements for particle filtering half masks as respiratory protective devices intended to protect the wearer in occupational settings, where there is a health risk(s) from inhaling any type of particles during working activities except for escape purposes.
Laboratory and practical performance tests or references to test method standards are included for the assessment of compliance with the requirements.
This standard applies to lidars installed on road vehicles to measure or detect the surroundings of the vehicle. This standard applies to lidars used on all types of road vehicles regardless of vehicle classifications, including passenger cars, buses, commercial vehicles, trailers, etc. This standard describes a series of test methods to assist in evaluating the performance of lidars. The tests should cover the following: 1. The common performance specifications (e.g. Range capability, Range precision). 2. The common performance characteristics (e.g. Anti-interference, Ghost points). 3. Possible alteration of performance test caused by environmental conditions. 4. Lidar performance for the union of both ADAS/AD application scenarios. This standard does not address test methods for reliability, functional safety, and cybersecurity. Note: The definition of “Road Vehicles” includes M1~M3, N1~N3, and L6~L7 according to consolidated resolution on the construction of vehicles (R.E.3).
This document specifies a common framework for audit trails for electronic health records (EHR), in terms of audit trigger events and audit data, to keep the complete set of personal health information auditable across information systems and domains. It is applicable to systems processing personal health information that create a secure audit record each time a user reads, creates, updates, or archives personal health information via the system. NOTE Such audit records at a minimum uniquely identify the user, uniquely identify the subject of care, identify the function performed by the user (record creation, read, update, etc.), and record the date and time at which the function was performed. This document covers only actions performed on the EHR, which are governed by the access policy for the domain where the electronic health record resides. It does not deal with any personal health information from the electronic health record, other than identifiers, the audit record only containing links to EHR segments as defined by the governing access policy. It does not cover the specification and use of audit logs for system management and system security purposes, such as the detection of performance problems, application flaw, or support for a reconstruction of data, which are dealt with by general computer security standards such as ISO/IEC 15408 (all parts)[9]. Annex A gives examples of audit scenarios. Annex B gives an overview of audit log services.