Produktionsteknik
- +Ämnesområden
- +Produktionsteknik (6)
- Tillverkningsprocesser (0)
- Additiv tillverkning (5)
- +Industriell processtyrning (0)
- +Verktygsmaskinssytem (0)
- +Verktygsmaskiner (0)
- +Skärande verktyg (0)
- +Verktyg för spånfri bearbetning (0)
- +Handverktyg (0)
- +Svetsning och lödning (1)
- +Industriugnar (0)
- Värmebehandling (0)
- +Ytbehandling och ytbeläggning (0)
This document covers additively manufactured stainless steel components using full-melt powder bed fusion such as electron beam melting and laser melting. The components produced by these processes are used typically in applications that require mechanical properties similar to machined forgings and wrought products. Components manufactured to this specification are often, but not necessarily, post processed via machining, grinding, electrical discharge machining (EDM), polishing, and so forth to achieve desired surface finish and critical dimensions. This document is intended for the use of mechanical engineers to size equipment, purchasers or producers, of additively manufactured components for defining the requirements and ensuring component properties. This document does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this document to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
This standard specifies the characterization of ceramic slurry for use as feedstock in vat photopolymerization additive manufacturing (AM) process. The characterization includes the composition and properties of the slurry, such as solids content, dynamic viscosity, particle size distribution, chemical composition, and solid dispersion stability. This standard also provides available methods about sampling and preparing slurry samples for testing. This standard does not deal with safety aspects.
This document specifies a classification of the imperfections likely to be generated during an additive manufacturing operation by PBF-LB (laser beam powder bed fusion) or PBF-EB (electron beam powder bed fusion) for metal parts. This document also indicates the most probable causes of the formation of imperfections and gives some illustrations taken from feedback. NOTE This classification applies to both PBF-LB and PBF-EB processes and can be extended to other additive manufacturing processes.
This document specifies the dimensions, the method of sampling and the preparation of the test specimens, also the conditions for performing the low temperature tensile test perpendicular to the weld in order to determine the low temperature tensile welding factor. A low temperature tensile test can be used in conjunction with other tests (e.g. bend, tensile creep, macro) to assess the performance of welded assemblies, made from thermoplastics materials. The low temperature tensile welding factor and the appearance of the fracture surface provide a guide regarding the ductility of the joint and the quality of the work. The test is applicable to co-axial or co-planar welded assemblies made from thermoplastics materials filled or unfilled, but not reinforced, irrespective of the welding process used. The test is not applicable for co-axial welded assemblies of an external diameter less than 20 mm.
1.1 This document is intended to be used to assign part classifications across the aviation industries that use AM to produce parts. 1.2 This document is applicable to all AM technologies defined in ISO/ASTM 52900 used in aviation. 1.3 This document is intended to be used to establish a metric for AM parts in downstream documents. 1.4 This document is not intended to establish criteria for any downstream processes, but rather to establish a metric that these processes can use. 1.5 The part classification metric could be utilized by the engineering, procurement, non-destructive inspection, testing, qualification, or certification processes used for AM aviation parts. 1.6 The classification scheme in this document establishes a consistent methodology to define and communicate the consequence of failure associated with AM aviation parts. 1.7 This document is not intended to supersede the requirements and definitions of the applicable regulations or policies, including but not limited to the ones listed in Annex A1. 1.8 Tables A.1.1-A.1.3 align the existing regulations and guidance with the four part classes established herein. However, this alignment should not be construed as an alignment of the existing regulations to each other. 1.9 The material or process, or both, in general does not affect the consequence of failure of a part, therefore the classification scheme defined in this document may be used outside AM. 1.10 The user of this document should not assume regulators’ endorsement of this document as accepted mean of compliance. 1.11 This document does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this document to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental documents and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.12 This document was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
This document defines a standardized framework for implementing a level system for temporarily self-sufficient systems in additive manufacturing. It defines principles, criteria, and provides guidance for categorizing additive manufacturing processes and technologies into different levels to support self-sufficient systems such as ships, oilrigs and assembly teams in the field or remote research stations. It aims to provide clarity and consistency for non-AM-experts dealing with logistical support of self-sufficient systems. This document is applicable to industries, military institutions, research institutions, and regulatory bodies involved in additive manufacturing, facilitating interoperability and harmonization of practices across different stakeholders