Informationsteknik, kontorsutrustning
- +Ämnesområden
- +Informationsteknik, kontorsutrustning (11)
- Informationsteknik: allmänt (2)
- IT-säkerhet (2)
- +Kodning av information (0)
- Programspråk (0)
- Programutveckling och systemdokumentation (1)
- +Öppna system (OSI) (0)
- Nätarkitekturer (0)
- Datorgrafik (0)
- Mikroprocessorsystem (0)
- Terminalutrustning och övrig kringutrustning (0)
- Gränssnitt och anslutningsutrustning (0)
- Molnbaserade datortjänster (0)
- +Datalagringsmedier (0)
- +IT-tillämpningar (7)
- Kontorsutrustning (0)
ISO/IEC 25063:2014 describes the Common Industry Format (CIF) for context of use descriptions and specifies the contents of both high-level and detailed descriptions of the context of use for an existing, intended, implemented or deployed system. A context-of-use description includes information about the users and other stakeholder groups, the characteristics of each user group, the goals of the users, the tasks of the users, and the environment(s) in which the system is used. The context of use description is applicable to software and hardware systems, products or services (excluding generic products, such as a display screen or keyboard). It is important to gather and analyse information on the current context in order to understand and then describe the context that will apply in the future system. The context of use description provides a collection of data relevant for analysis, specification, design and evaluation of an interactive system from the perspective of the various user groups and other stakeholders.
This document gives guidelines for: a process on privacy impact assessments, and a structure and content of a PIA report. It is applicable to all types and sizes of organizations, including public companies, private companies, government entities and not-for-profit organizations. This document is relevant to those involved in designing or implementing projects, including the parties operating data processing systems and services that process PII.
The scope of this standard is to define a nomenclature for communication of information from point-of care medical devices. Primary emphasis is placed on acute care medical devices and patient vital signs information. The nomenclature also supports concepts in an object oriented information model that is for medical device communications. This amendment extends IEEE Std 11073-10101-2019 to include additional terms primarily related to infusion pumps, ventilators, dialysis and other key medical devices as well as event and alert identifiers for devices and systems used in acute care
This document provides methodology for the use of statistical methods to assess robustness properties of neural networks. The document focuses on how to select, apply and manage statistical methods to assess robustness properties.
The standard specifies a data model in UML and a derived XML schema (XSD) for defining the Level of Information Need in software applications based on concepts and principles given in Part 1, and guidance given in Part 2, in compliance with the principles and data exchange standards of data templates (ISO 23387). The standard defines the exchange format schema in XSD according to the UML schema and it gives guidelines for the usage and application of the schema. In addition, the integration with Linked Data principles and paradigms will be demonstrated.
This document gives guidelines for: a process on privacy impact assessments, and a structure and content of a PIA report. It is applicable to all types and sizes of organizations, including public companies, private companies, government entities and not-for-profit organizations. This document is relevant to those involved in designing or implementing projects, including the parties operating data processing systems and services that process PII.
This document defines a framework for assessing the quality of data governance and data management practices for participants in data spaces. It specifies the core principles, processes, and assessment elements that enable organizations to manage, monitor, and improve their data governance and data management practices. The framework comprises two components: • Process Reference Model: Defines key processes for data governance and data product management of data space participants, including its fundamental principles, structure, detailed process definitions, links to broader data governance, and required implementation measures. • Process Assessment Framework: Outlines a model to evaluate process capability by establishing six distinct quality levels expressed in terms of capability levels, describing the corresponding profiles and guiding the systematic assessment. This standard is aimed at supporting data governance and data management professionals, IT managers, quality assurance officers, and regulatory bodies. This standard is applicable to organizations of all types and sizes.
This document outlines the concepts and principles for information management at a stage of maturity described as "building information modelling (BIM) according to the ISO 19650 series". This document provides recommendations for a framework to manage information including exchanging, recording, versioning and organizing for all actors. This document is applicable to the whole life cycle of any built asset, including strategic planning, initial design, engineering, development, documentation and construction, day-to-day operation, maintenance, refurbishment, repair and end-of-life. This document can be adapted to assets or projects of any scale and complexity, so as not to hamper the flexibility and versatility that characterize the large range of potential procurement strategies and so as to address the cost of implementing this document.
This document specifies requirements for information management, in the form of a management process, within the context of the delivery phase of assets and the exchanges of information within it, using building information modelling. This document can be applied to all types of assets and by all types and sizes of organizations, regardless of the chosen procurement strategy.
This document specifies a common framework for audit trails for electronic health records (EHR), in terms of audit trigger events and audit data, to keep the complete set of personal health information auditable across information systems and domains. It is applicable to systems processing personal health information that create a secure audit record each time a user reads, creates, updates, or archives personal health information via the system. NOTE Such audit records at a minimum uniquely identify the user, uniquely identify the subject of care, identify the function performed by the user (record creation, read, update, etc.), and record the date and time at which the function was performed. This document covers only actions performed on the EHR, which are governed by the access policy for the domain where the electronic health record resides. It does not deal with any personal health information from the electronic health record, other than identifiers, the audit record only containing links to EHR segments as defined by the governing access policy. It does not cover the specification and use of audit logs for system management and system security purposes, such as the detection of performance problems, application flaw, or support for a reconstruction of data, which are dealt with by general computer security standards such as ISO/IEC 15408 (all parts)[9]. Annex A gives examples of audit scenarios. Annex B gives an overview of audit log services.
This document specifies the evaluation of computer vision systems, in the sense of measuring the quality of a system’s results to assess its functional suitability. It provides a definition of evaluation methods for those systems, together with guidance on how to select, implement and interpret those evaluation methods. This document covers quantitative metrics as well as other evaluation methods. It includes requirements on the implementation of the described metrics, and further requirements on the technical resources involved in the evaluation process.