Ämnesområden

This part of ISO 11855 specifies procedures and conditions to enable the heat flow in water based and electrical surface heating and cooling systems to be determined relative to the medium differential temperature for systems. The determination of thermal performance of water based surface heating and cooling systems and their conformity to this part of ISO 11855 is carried out by calculation in accordance with design documents and a model. This should enable a uniform assessment and calculation of water based surface heating and cooling systems.

The surface temperature and the temperature uniformity of the heated/cooled surface, nominal heat flow density between water or electrical heated layer and space, the associated nominal medium differential temperature, and the field of characteristic curves for the relationship between heat flow density and the determining variables are given as the result.

The ISO 11855 series is applicable to water based embedded surface heating and cooling systems in residential, commercial and industrial buildings1). The methods apply to systems integrated into the wall, floor or ceiling construction without any open air gaps. It does not apply to ceiling mounted panel systems with open air gaps which are not integrated into the building structure.

The ISO 11855 series also applies, as appropriate, to the use of fluids other than water as a heating or cooling medium. The ISO 11855 series is not applicable for testing of systems. The methods do not apply to heated or chilled ceiling panels or beams.

This part 6 of ISO 18566 establishes guidelines for the determination of input parameters for ceiling mounted radiant heating and cooling panels for the ISO 52031. The requirements specified by this part 6 of ISO 18566 are applicable only to the components of the heating/cooling systems and the elements which are part of the heating/cooling panels and which are installed to provide heating and/or cooling.

The ISO 18566- series is applicable to water based ceiling mounted radiant heating and cooling panels in residential, commercial and industrial buildings. The methods apply to systems mounted under the ceiling with an open air gap between the panels and the ceiling.

The ISO 18566- series also applies, as appropriate, to the use of fluids other than water as a heating or cooling medium. The ISO 18566- series is also applicable for testing of systems. The methods do not apply to heated or chilled ceiling beams.

This document specifies elements of communications for localized communications in ITS.
Especially, the following architectures, procedures and protocols are specified:

— Support of communication interfaces (DSRC-CI) using the DSRC application layer specified in ISO 15628,

— Support of ISO 15628 DSRC applications via an ITS access technology suited for localized communications.

This part of ISO 6935 specifies technical requirements for ribbed bars to be used as reinforcement in concrete.

This part of ISO 6935 is applicable to steel delivered in the form of bars, coils and de-coiled products. It includes both weldable and non-weldable steels.

The production process is at the discretion of the manufacturer.

This part of ISO6935 is not applicable to ribbed bars produced from finished products, such as plates and railway rails.

This document specifies a basic laboratory test method to evaluate the deinkability, applicable to any kind of printed paper product, under alkaline conditions by means of single stage flotation deinking and fatty acid based collector chemistry.

This document describes a method for the determination of aluminium in food by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) after pressure digestion. This method is suitable for mass fraction in the range of 15 mg/kg to 200 mg/kg. At concentrations above 200 mg/kg digestion temperatures higher than 220 °C can be necessary to recover the aluminium as completely as possible.

This document describes a method for the determination of organomercury in seafood/fishery products by elemental mercury analysis. The method has been successfully valideted in an interlaboratory study with a working range from 0,013 mg/kg to 5,12 mg/kg (HORRAT values < 2) in seafood/fishery products [1], [2]. The limit of quantification is approximately 0,010 mg/kg organomercury (referring to dry weight, expressed as mercury) [3], [4].

Organic species of mercury, other than monomethylmercury, are also extracted and thus determined with this method. However, in seafood/fishery products the contribution from organic species of mercury other than monomethylmercury is negligible.

This European Standard specifies safety requirements and their verification for the design and construction of power take-off (PTO) drive shafts and their guards linking a tractor or self-propelled machinery to the first fixed bearing of recipient machinery, by describing methods for the elimination or reduction of risks which need specific requirements. It is applicable only to those PTO drive shafts and guards mechanically linked to the shaft by at least two bearings.

In addition, it specifies the type of information on safe working practices to be provided by the manufacturer.

This European Standard does not deal with:

— the guards totally covering, but not mechanically linked to, the PTO drive shaft;

— the mechanical characteristics of PTO drive shafts, overrun devices and torque limiters;

— general hazards which are dealt with in EN ISO 4254-1:2015 (see introduction);

Environmental aspects have not been considered in this standard.

This document is not applicable to PTO drive shafts and their guards which are manufactured before the date of publication of this document by CEN.

This part of ISO 11003 specifies a shear test for the characterization of adhesives in a bond. The shear stress/strain properties of the adhesive (including the shear modulus) are useful for advanced design work, e.g. in finite element analysis methods.

This part of ISO 11003 specifies a test method for determining the shear behaviour of an adhesive in a single lap joint bonded assembly when subjected to a tensile force.

The test is performed on specimens consisting of thick, rigid adherends, with a short length of overlap, in order to obtain the most uniform distribution of shear stresses possible and to minimize other stress states which initiate failure.

This test method may be used to determine:

— the shear-stress against shear-strain curve to failure of the adhesive;

— the shear modulus of the adhesive;

— other adhesive properties that can be derived from the stress/strain curve such as secant shear modulus and maximum shear stress;

— the effect of temperature, environment, test speed, etc., on these properties.

This International Standard describes a test method for measuring the shear and/or tensile strength of an adhesively bonded plastic/plastic specimen of a specific design. This method allows the determination of a combined shear and tensile behaviour of the bond. These shear and tensile values are useful for design purposes.

1.1 This part of ISO 179 specifies a method for determining Charpy impact properties of plastics from force-deflection diagrams. Different types of rod-shaped test specimens and test configurations, as well as test parameters depending on the type of material, the type of test specimen and the type of notch are defined in Part 1 of ISO 179.

Dynamic effects such as load-cell/striker resonance, test specimen resonance and initial-contact/inertia peaks are described (see Figure 1, Curve b, and Annex A).

1.2 ISO 179-1 is suitable for characterizing the impact behaviour by the impact strength only and for using apparatus whose potential energy is matched approximately to the particular energy to break to be measured (see ISO 13802, Annex E). This part of ISO 179 is used if a force-deflection or force-time diagram is necessary for detailed characterization of the impact behaviour, and for developing automatic apparatus, i.e. avoiding the need, mentioned above, to match energy.

1.3 For the range of materials which may be tested by this method, see ISO 179-1, Clause 1.

1.4 For the general comparability of test results, see ISO 179-1, Clause 1.

1.5 The method may not be used as a source of data for design calculations on components. However, the possible use of data is not the subject of this part of ISO 179. Any application of data obtained using this part of ISO 179 should be specified by a referring standard or agreed upon by the interested parties.

Information on the typical behaviour of materials can be obtained by testing at different temperatures, by varying the notch radius and/or specimen thickness and by testing specimens prepared under different conditions.

It is not the purpose of this part of ISO 179 to give an interpretation of the mechanism occurring at every point on the force-deflection diagram. These interpretations are a task for on-going scientific research.

1.6 The test results are comparable only if the conditions of test specimen preparation, as well as the test conditions, are the same. Comprehensive evaluation of the reaction to impact stress requires that determinations be made as a function of deformation rate and temperature for different material variables such as crystallinity and moisture content. The impact behaviour of finished products cannot, therefore, be predicted directly from this test, but test specimens may be taken from finished products for testing by this method.

1.7 Impact strengths determined by this method may replace those determined using ISO 179-1 if comparability has been established by previous tests.

1.1 This documentd specifies requirements for the design and manufacture of mincing machines (see Figures 1 a and 1 b).

The mincing machines (hereinafter referred to as machine) covered by this document are used for size reduction of fresh or frozen meat, meat products and fish (hereinafter referred to as product) by cutting in a set of cutting tools.

Machines for domestic uses are not included in this document. Filling mincers are covered by EN 12463 "Food processing machinery — Filling machines and auxiliary machines — Safety and hygiene requirements".

This document applies only to machines that are manufactured after the date of issue of this document.

This document covers:

— professional machines used for on-demand preparation in shops characterized by:

— designed as a table top machine;

— and having a feed tray;

— and the product is only feed manually;

— and is only operated from the ground;

— and is operated by no more than one operator;

— and with full visibility and full accessibility of the entire machine from the operator workstation;

— and having hole plate diameter ≤ 106 mm;

— and a worm casing set which is removable without using any tools;

— and the weight of the worm casing set ≤ 15 kg;

NOTE The table top machine can be equipped with a frame or base, so no separate table is needed.

— industrial machines used for industrial mass production, and which cannot be characterized as a professional machine.

The extent to which hazards are covered, is indicated in this document. For other hazards which are not covered by this document, machinery should comply with EN ISO 12100:2010 where applicable.

This document does not describe the specific requirements for the control of machines with foot switch.

This document does not describe the specific requirements for additional mixing screws in the feed intake hopper which are covered by EN 13570 "Food processing machinery — Mixing machines — Safety and hygiene requirements".

1.2 This document covers the following types of machines:

— machine with feed tray, feed intake and pusher (see Figure 3);

— machine with feed tray, feed intake, restrictor plate and pusher (see Figure 4);

— machine with feed intake hopper, cover and screw conveyor (see Figure 5);

— machine with feed intake hopper, with or without cover, screw conveyor, with loading device (continuously or discontinuously).

Machines comprise a machine base, a worm casing with a worm, a feed tray (with feed intake) or a feed intake hopper, a screw conveyor, a set of cutting tools, a lock nut, a loading device, a drive motor and – depending on machine type – electrical, hydraulic and pneumatic components. They will also have various safeguarding devices as examples in Clause 5.

Machines may be equipped e.g. with:

— an extraction claw;

— an ejector or extractor;

— a protective hood over the discharge outlet;

— a cover over the inlet opening of the feed intake hopper;

— a transport carriage for the lock nut, the set of cutting tools, the worm and the screw conveyor;

— a lifting device for the lock nut, the set of cutting tools, the worm and the screw conveyor;

— a loading device.

1.1 General

This document applies to:

— filling machines with cylinder and piston;

— filling machines with feed intake hopper;

— filling machines with vacuum hopper;

hereafter referred to as filling machines which process e.g. meat, cheese and other pasty substances, excluding dry or frozen materials. They pump foodstuff into casings or bring it to a following process.

This document applies also to the interchangeable equipment for filling machines with which a wide range of additional functions can be implemented. For example: portioning, depositing, mincing, co-extruding, dividing and forming.

This document deals with all significant hazards, hazardous situations and events relevant to filling machines and interchangeable equipment (hereafter referred to as machines), when they are used as intended and under the conditions foreseen by the manufacturer and also the reasonable foreseeable misuse (see Clause 4).

These significant hazards, hazardous situations and events can arise during all the life phases including transportation, assembly, dismantling, disabling and scrapping of the machines.

This document is not applicable to machines which were manufactured before the date of publication of this document by CEN.

Filling machines described in this document are no forming, filling and sealing machines as described in EN 415-3:1999+A1:2009. Clipping machines as described in EN 13885:2005+A1:2010 are not covered by this document.

1.2 Types of filling machines and interchangeable equipment covered by this standard

1.2.1 Filling machines with cylinder and piston

Filling machines with cylinder and piston consist of piston, closing cover, machine frame, accessory drive mechanism and electrical and hydraulic components (see Figure 1).

The material being processed will be fed by hand into the cylinder.

Filling machines with cylinder and piston can be fitted with a dividing device.

1.2.2 Filling machines with feed intake hopper

Filling machines with feed intake hopper (with or without infeed auger, see Figure 2) consist of feeder on the discharge side of the feed intake hopper, machine frame, drive mechanism for interchangeable equipment and electric, electronic or pneumatic components, depending on machine type.

The material being processed will be fed by hand (or optionally a loading device) into the feeding hopper of the filling machine.

Filling machines with feed intake hopper can be equipped with:

— dividing device;

— cover or photoelectric guard at the mouth of the feed intake hopper;

— pressure-sensitive protective device at the hopper edge;

— divided hopper;

— infeed auger;

— counter auger;

— step or ladder;

— two-hand control device at the mouth of the feed intake hopper;

— knee-operated lever switches or hand operated switches.

1.2.3 Filling machines with vacuum hopper

Filling machines with vacuum hopper (with or without infeed auger, see Figure 3) consist of suction pipe with storage container, feeder, vacuum hopper with locking device on the intake side, machine frame, drives for interchangeable equipment and electrical, electronic or pneumatic components, depending on the machinery category.

Filling machines with vacuum hoppers can be loaded by one or more of the following:

— manual loading;

— vacuum suction;

— feeder.

Filling machines with vacuum hoppers are to be switched on and off by lever switches operated by knee or hand and/or by remote control signals.

Filling machines with vacuum hoppers can be equipped with:

— dividing device;

— cover on vacuum hopper;

— infeed auger;

— counter auger;

— foot board or ladder;

— suction pipe and storage container.

1.2.4 Interchangeable equipment for filling machines

Interchangeable equipment are devices which can be assembled to filling machinery by the operator in order to attribute one or more new functions such as: portioning, twisting, voiding, forming, mincing. Interchangeable equipment does not operate independently. The interchangeable equipment will be actuated directly or by filling machines.

Interchangeable equipment dealt with in this document (see 5.3.4) are:

— cutting device (see Figure 13);

— forming device (see Figure 14);

— twisting device (see Figure 15);

— linking gear box (see Figure 16);

— portioning device (see Figure 17);

— holding device (see Figure 18);

— mincing device (see Figure 19);

— sausage production device (see Figure 20);

— filling stream divider device (see Figure 21);

— casing spooling device (see Figure 22);

— co-extrusion device (see Figure 23);

— loading device (see Figure 24).

This document specifies the safety and performance requirements and tests methods for the components for supply systems. Their intended use is the supply with liquid fuel for one or more consuming units from one or more tanks.

NOTE For examples of supply systems see Annex D.

This document applies to pressurized, negative pressurized, unpressurised, underground, above ground, inside and/or outside systems to supply liquid fuels.

The components for supply systems covered by this document are piping kits/systems and their components.

Not covered by this document are items belonging to the consuming unit (e.g.: heating/cooling appliances in buildings) and items used for the mounting and support of components.

Not covered by this document are items with the intended use of gas for building heating/cooling systems and any items of heating networks.

Not covered are items used for drainage (including highways) and disposal of other liquids and gaseous waste, supply of gases, pressure and vacuum systems, communications, sanitary and cleaning fixtures and storage fixtures.

This document specifies methods for flame tests to be applied to respiratory protective devices.

This document specifies practical performance tests for respiratory protective devices, except for diving apparatus. The purpose of these tests is to subjectively assess certain properties, characteristics and functions of the device, when worn by test subjects in simulated practical use, which cannot be assessed by tests described in other standards.

This document specifies conformance tests in the form of an Abstract Test Suite (ATS) for a System

Under Test (SUT) implementing an EVCC or SECC according to ISO 15118‐2. These conformance tests

specify the testing of capabilities and behaviors of an SUT as well as checking what is observed against

the conformance requirements specified in ISO 15118‐2 and against what the supplier states the SUT

implementation's capabilities are.

The capability tests within the ATS check that the observable capabilities of the SUT are in accordance

with the static conformance requirements defined in ISO 15118‐2. The behavior tests of the ATS

examine an implementation as thoroughly as is practical over the full range of dynamic conformance

requirements defined in ISO 15118‐2 and within the capabilities of the SUT (see NOTE).

A test architecture is described in correspondence to the ATS. The conformance test cases in this

document are described leveraging this test architecture and are specified in TTCN‐3 Core Language for

ISO/OSI Network Layer (Layer 3) and above. The conformance test cases for the Data Link Layer (Layer

2) and Physical Layer (Layer 1) are described in ISO 15118‐5. Test cases with overlapping scopes are

explicitly detailed.

This document does not include specific tests of other standards referenced within ISO 15118‐2, e.g.

IETF RFCs. Furthermore, the conformance tests specified in this document do not include the

assessment of performance nor robustness or reliability of an implementation. They cannot provide

judgments on the physical realization of abstract service primitives, how a system is implemented, how

it provides any requested service, nor the environment of the protocol implementation. Furthermore,

the test cases defined in this document only consider the communication protocol defined ISO 15118‐2.

Power flow between the EVSE and the EV is not considered.

NOTE 1 Practical limitations make it impossible to define an exhaustive test suite, and economic considerations

can restrict testing even further. Hence, the purpose of this document is to increase the probability that different

implementations are able to interwork. This is achieved by verifying them by means of a protocol test suite,

thereby increasing the confidence that each implementation conforms to the protocol specification. However, the

specified protocol test suite cannot guarantee conformance to the specification since it detects errors rather than

their absence. Thus conformance to a test suite alone cannot guarantee interworking. What it does do is give

confidence that an implementation has the required capabilities and that its behavior conforms consistently in

representative instances of communication.

NOTE 2 This document has some interdependencies to the conformance tests defined in ISO 15118‐5 which

result from ISO/OSI cross layer dependencies in the underlying protocol specification (e.g. for sleep mode)

This document specifies conformance tests in the form of an Abstract Test Suite (ATS) for a System

Under Test (SUT) implementing an Electric Vehicle or Supply Equipment Communication Controller

(EVCC or SECC) with support for PLC‐based High Level Communication (HLC) and Basic Signaling

according to ISO 15118‐3. These conformance tests specify the testing of capabilities and behaviors of

an SUT, as well as checking what is observed against the conformance requirements specified in

ISO 15118‐3 and against what the implementer states the SUT implementation's capabilities are.

The capability tests within the ATS check that the observable capabilities of the SUT are in accordance

with the static conformance requirements defined in ISO 15118‐3. The behavior tests of the ATS

examine an implementation as thoroughly as is practical over the full range of dynamic conformance

requirements defined in ISO 15118‐3 and within the capabilities of the SUT (see NOTE 1).

A test architecture is described in correspondence to the ATS. The conformance test cases in this part of

the standard are described leveraging this test architecture and are specified in TTCN‐3 Core Language

for the ISO/OSI Physical and Data Link Layers (Layers 1 and 2). The conformance test cases for the

ISO/OSI Network Layer (Layer 3) and above are described in ISO 15118‐4.

In terms of coverage, this document only covers normative sections and requirements in ISO 15118‐3.

This document can additionally include specific tests for requirements of referenced standards (e.g.

IEEE, or industry consortia standards) as long as they are relevant in terms of conformance for

implementations according to ISO 15118‐3. However, it is explicitly not intended to widen the scope of

this conformance specification to such external standards, if it is not technically necessary for the

purpose of conformance testing for ISO 15118‐3. Furthermore, the conformance tests specified in this

document do not include the assessment of performance nor robustness or reliability of an

implementation. They cannot provide judgments on the physical realization of abstract service

primitives, how a system is implemented, how it provides any requested service, nor the environment

of the protocol implementation. Furthermore, the test cases defined in this document only consider the

communication protocol and the system's behavior defined ISO 15118‐3. Power flow between the EVSE

and the EV is not considered.

NOTE 1 Practical limitations make it impossible to define an exhaustive test suite, and economic considerations

can restrict testing even further. Hence, the purpose of this document is to increase the probability that different

implementations are able to interwork. This is achieved by verifying them by means of a protocol test suite,

thereby increasing the confidence that each implementation conforms to the protocol specification. However, the

specified protocol test suite cannot guarantee conformance to the specification since it detects errors rather than

their absence. Thus conformance to a test suite alone cannot guarantee interworking. What it does do is give

confidence that an implementation has the required capabilities and that its behavior conforms consistently in

representative instances of communication.

NOTE 2 This document has some interdependencies to the conformance tests defined in ISO 15118‐4 which

result from ISO/OSI cross layer dependencies in the underlying protocol specification (e.g. for sleep mode)